Vigilance, not vigilantes

October 27, 1993

Anyone can sympathize with the feelings of residents on the Jessup-based Citizens Advisory Board for Correctional Institutions, who recently requested that the state provide them with a list of inmates slated for release into their communities. There is ample fear almost everywhere over the release of potential repeat offenders, especially those convicted of violent crimes.

The advisory board residents were doubly concerned following last month's arrest of Thurman Alexander Moore.

Nearly two months after he was released from the Mental Health Unit at Patuxent Institution after serving 19 years for the rape of a girl, the man was re-arrested on charges of attempting to rape a Columbia woman. The case drew broad attention because the owner of a local barbecue stand heard the woman's screams, came to her rescue and apprehended Moore.

However reasonable people's fears, though, supplying residents with lists of released convicts would only fan the flames of fear.

Melanie Gutjahr, chairwoman of the advisory board, says she simply wants residents to know who is being released into their neighborhoods so that they can protect their families from harm. But what is it residents can do once they receive this information? Any steps they can take within the law they should be taking already.

"I am a law-abiding citizen and I have not been arrested," Ms. Gutjahr says. "I have a right to know when someone who has committed a crime is being released into my neighborhood."

Some of this information is already available to the public if they seek it. Also, what of the notion that someone who has been properly released from prison has served his debt to society? Can we summarily write off everyone who has spent time in prison, even for a violent crime?

By the same token, the concerned residents could as easily be victimized by someone not recently released from prison. Lastly, what good would come of a list of names? Repeat offenders don't introduce themselves by name. Without a description, a resident wouldn't know John Ex-Con from John Doe.

That's not to belittle the residents' fears and concerns. They're real and justified. But this proposal doesn't appear to solve anything. If they took matters into their own hands, the residents would risk being no better than the criminals they now fear.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.