Rash Field folly shows Schmoke is out of touchHow nice for...

the Forum

October 22, 1993

Rash Field folly shows Schmoke is out of touch

How nice for Mayor Kurt Schmoke that Baltimore City is able to commit $8 million to enhance the Inner Harbor by revamping the already pleasant Rash Field area.

Forgive me if I sound incredulous, but as a city resident whose taxes are outrageous and who has seen such crucial services as police, fire and education cut, this latest bulletin strikes me as profoundly absurd.

Certainly I don't mean to imply that the need for forward-thinking projects that attract tourism and boost the economy are not important.

But do we need to wait until Baltimore becomes another Miami to understand that no matter how nice a city's tourist attractions are, a highly publicized murder rate is a major deterrent?

I urge the mayor and the Baltimore Development Corp. to consider shelving the plan to renovate Rash Field and put that $8 million into services that will enable Baltimore City to help regain some of the important ground that it has lost under Schmoke's regime.

That the mayor still doesn't seem to understand the urgency of investments in education, safety and quality of life for city taxpayers is continuing proof that Baltimore is sorely in need of leadership in the 1990s.

Caroline Spencer


Rowdy kids

During the second act of the Morris Mechanic Theater's Oct. 16 matinee performance of "The Madness of George III," the audience was the victim of a tumultuous disturbance created by a large group of students who were attending the play for free.

Both the audience and the performers were very shaken by the students' uncalled for behavior. The so-called punishment was the prompt ejection of the whole student group, which left a noisy exit in its wake.

The big question is whether the Morris Mechanic management and school authorities will allow a repetition of this type of behavior at free performances in the future.

Joseph Saffron


What recovery?

In his "On the Other Hand" of Oct. 5, Dan Berger states, "How come the longer this recovery goes on, the more Americans get poor?"

What recovery? I must put him in the class with all those other "economists" and "experts" who say the recession is over.

Apparently to them a recession ends when things stop getting worse. But to me a recession ends when things have returned to the status they were before the recession started.

To anyone who has lost anything in the recession (which I choose to call a depression, and we are still very much in it), recovery may not come for many years, if ever.

Take, for instance, someone who has 10 years equity in their home. They lose their job, then their home. At some point, perhaps years from now, they will have become employed again, and start to purchase another home.

They have not recovered from this recession until they have made 10 years of payments on that new home, in other words returning to the point they were before being affected by this recession.

And since this all can make them work longer in life to finish paying for the home, and therefore have less life left in their retirement years, in actuality, they never recover from this recession.

So don't speak of recovery and the recession having ended in 1991. Ask anyone who has been affected by it. And it is this lingering recession that is making more Americans get poor.

Harry E. Bennett, Jr.


Speak proper American

Complaints about our English language have a permanent, though cyclic, place on the pages of The Evening Sun. The latest series (letters, Edward Rondthaler, Sept. 30; Linda Baker, Oct. 8; Karen Davis, Oct. 14) brings forth lots of words, both good and bad.

But the gist of the problem was not mentioned. Let me mention it now.

The problem is that we change the way we say the words. Way back, when only the better-off folks could afford education, the literate ones wrote English fairly phonetically.

The rest, the majority of English speakers, mangled the spoken language as they pleased. The spoken language won, but the educated ones stayed with their history-laden but now obsolete "phonetic" spelling. After all, since when does the lowlife dictate to the upper crust?

The simplest solution to our problem is to revert to the old way of saying the words. The old phonetic way, as the words are properly written.

For example: A member of King Arthur's Round Table is a "knight" in English, or a "knecht" in German. The writing is fairly close, as are the languages, but the saying differs a lot. Germans continue saying "knecht", English-speakers say "nite" ("nait," to be more phonetic).

Go ahead, say knight the old way. Doesn't the sound carry a bit of old-world charm and chivalry with it? But is this a good solution? Yes, it is. Should we take it? No. There is a better solution.

English is no longer like our English. Or Australian English, or take-your-pick English. English is fragmenting into a family of new languages. Let's say "thank you" to English and go on to the next one.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.