Health plan jeopardizes medical careKudos to Mike Royko...

the Forum

October 18, 1993

Health plan jeopardizes medical care

Kudos to Mike Royko for his Oct. 4 column regarding Hillary Clinton's health plan.

It amazes me that everyone does not see, or chooses to ignore, all of the negatives of the plan. The minimal benefits, however, received praise far and wide.

Just consider if you are a fly on the wall in a doctor's lounge or lunchroom over the past few weeks, you would have found that all the conversations about the plan are the same: emotions of fear, bewilderment and anger abound.

I know that many people feel that doctors are overpaid and that we are the only ones who will sacrifice with this plan. But, doctors know better.

When we are alone and no one else is listening and we have no reason to pull any punches, what we tell each other is no different than what we are telling everyone else.

Sure, we are concerned about our livelihoods. We have studied and worked hard for what we have.

But we are also certain that the plan jeopardizes the future of the best medical care delivery system in the world. The big benefit that has been touted of cost reductions will never materialize.

Above all, most of us in the "trenches" are frustrated. We know the truth and no one seems to be listening.

The American people have always trusted our health and lives, and the lives of our families, to doctors.

Are we now willing to allow slick-talking politicians to ruin yet another portion of what makes America great?

Neil M. Scheffler

Baltimore

Insulting sketch

At the Oct. 7 meeting of the Dundalk Revitalization Committee, the first topic of business was the understandable outrage of committee members regarding the editorial cartoon that appeared in The Evening Sun on Sept. 29.

This cartoon was intended to be funny but, in fact, was actually sad. It depicted what the artist believed the interior of a "Dundalk Democratic Club" would look like. It showed Delegate John Arnick sitting next to an enormously fat, tattooed, heavily made up, slovenly-looking woman who appeared enamored of Mr. Arnick.

With one fell swoop, the editorial board, in allowing this so-called cartoon to be printed, insulted the intelligence of the entire Dundalk area, populated with approximately 80,000 people.

In addition, the particular way in which the woman is presented in the cartoon represents a grave injustice to all women of the Dundalk area. This unfortunate misrepresentation slanders an entire group of hard-working, decent women simply because they happen to live in or near Dundalk.

I have lived in Dundalk my entire life. When I think of my average female neighbor, I think of either the many caring grandmothers around town or the legion of hard-working responsible women, some of whom are mothers juggling their exhausting schedules between work and taking care of their children.

Quite honestly, they do not deserve this capricious insult of the editorial board.

Why this depiction is so unfair is that it perpetuates a popular misconception about the inhabitants of Dundalk.

As it is, degrading Dundalk comments abound from seemingly otherwise well mannered people. This cartoon seemingly condones those feelings and opinions. It makes it OK to ridicule and belittle those of us who are from Dundalk.

As an attorney who frequently travels the state to attend hearings and trials, I frequently hear the comment, "You don't look like you're from Dundalk." Just what someone from Dundalk is supposed to look like, according to the newspaper, is evident in the cartoon.

In allowing the publication of this cartoon, the newspaper purposely degraded 80,000 citizens.

As a result, The Evening Sun owes the people, especially the women, in the community of Dundalk an apology and a guarantee that such irresponsible and damaging publications will not be allowed in the future.

William C. Batton

Dundalk

Football team

Congratulations to Ken Rosenthal. In attempting to criticize the "Bombers" name for Baltimore's prospective new football team, he succeeds in demeaning the efforts of both World War II veterans and all those involved in the defense industry charged with the responsibility of protecting our country.

He sarcastically remarks that "all Baltimore did was serve as headquarters for defense contractors that invented and built war planes," and follows with a derisive comment: "Makes your head swell with pride."

Well guess what? A lot of us are proud of the part our city and country played in winning World War II.

And since when did the words "defense contractor" and "war planes" become dirty words? I guess since you decided that in this era of "peace" we just don't need these terms anymore.

While the "Bombers" name may not be as "politically correct" as you would like, neither is it the war-mongering image that you have conjured up. As for the name itself, I think most of us could not care less. If Baltimore is fortunate enough to get a team, we'll support it regardless of the name.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.