Procurement Probe Could Change Way State Does Business

October 17, 1993|By BRUCE L. BORTZ and JAY LECHTMAN

Remember Ross Perot's great line of the 1992 presidential campaign? The one about looking under the hood of government and having a go at it with his wrench?

In a very real sense, that's precisely what the legislature's Joint Task Force on Maryland's Procurement Law is doing in Annapolis these days. Each year, Maryland buys more than $4 billion in goods and services -- yes, it's an expensive car they're examining.

But, rather than engaging in a major overhaul of the state's contracting system or trading it in for some other model, the legislature's collective leadership looks as if it'll install some new parts and perform a long overdue, if minor, tuneup. Out of this rare diagnosis and repair will doubtless come a better-running purchasing vehicle for Maryland.

Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr., a Prince George's Democrat, got the task force started late this summer. During the Schaefer years, he reasoned, there had been so many controversies over high-profile contracts -- principally lottery contracts, but also one for a home detention system -- that a public perception of wrongdoing had been created.

To examine and improve the process and to restore public confidence, he asked his committee chairmen and vice chairmen to participate in a panel that would examine state laws, regulations, and the most contentious contracts.

House Speaker R. Clayton Mitchell Jr., a Kent Democrat, later agreed to have his body's chairmen and vice chairmen participate as well. By making the task force a joint one, Mr. Mitchell's decision all but guaranteed that some legislative changes would be passed during the 1994 session.

The task force has met three times since starting last month. Four more meetings are scheduled. With an eye toward reaching some conclusions, panelists (and they represent close to one-sixth of the legislature) will begin conferring after the next meeting, set for Oct. 26. The panel's recommendations will likely come by early December.

One fascinating subplot to all this involves state politics. Eyes may glaze over at mention of complicated and technical procurement regulations. But procurement could very well be the first concrete issue of the '94 state campaigns.

The GOP's attorney general hopeful, Richard Bennett, included procurement reform in his recent candidacy announcement. Democrat Eleanor Carey has made early pronouncements on the subject. And the incumbent, Attorney General J. Joseph Curran Jr., has shown recent interest in the matter, even suggesting legislative reforms.

Privately, legislators on the task force are saying that Mr. Curran's assistant attorneys general haven't been aggressive (or objective) enough in spotting potential problems in procurement contracts. The explanation: They've become co-opted by the agencies to which they're providing legal advice.

Another procurement-related political race could be that of state comptroller. Sen. John A. Cade, an Anne Arundel Republican, admits that he's mulling over a challenge to nine-term Democratic incumbent Louis Goldstein.

Though the task force has four co-chairs, Mr. Cade, a crusty legislative veteran, is clearly in charge. His sense of humor, wide-ranging management experience and intellectual prowess are respected and feared in Annapolis. Though he could politically capitalize on his task force role, he has so far chosen not to.

Mr. Goldstein, who serves as a member of the state's procurement oversight body, the Board of Public Works, always runs scared, whether he needs to or not. Already he's feeling some of the task force heat.

A man who's probably reviewed and approved 40,000 contracts in his long career, Mr. Goldstein is cracking down at the Board of Public Works, refusing to OK sole source contracts (ones where only one company was contacted for a bid) without receiving satisfactory written justifications from state agency heads.

Thus far, task force workings have been essentially apolitical, with sessions deliberately kept basic and boring. With one clear exception (the Lottery Agency) legislators have been very careful not to level charges or to voice conclusions publicly.

Hanging over all this is the U.S. attorney's investigation, begun last year into Maryland gambling contracts. Federal investigators have been spotted frequently in Annapolis office buildings. Few doubt that they're monitoring Procurement Task Force sessions. And, more important, the rumors continue that U.S. Attorney Lynne Battaglia could get a grand jury to hand down indictments by December. If that happens, they will arrive as the task force is completing its work. (Its last scheduled meeting is Dec. 8).

One of the task force's other intriguing sideshows is how the executive branch, which essentially carries out state procurement, has reacted to the legislature's new-found interest oversight.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.