Not TypicalThis is in response to Roger Simon's July 16...


July 29, 1993

Not Typical

This is in response to Roger Simon's July 16 column, concerning his recent jury duty.

Jury duty is the cornerstone of American democracy. It is also the cornerstone of the American justice system. A juror's contribution to the legal system is invaluable and cannot be overemphasized.

Sensitive questions concerning a juror's background should be discreetly reviewed. If a juror has committed a criminal act that disqualifies him or her from jury duty, then this is screened through a questionnaire sent to all potential jurors before jury duty service begins.

If a judge needs to ask a question about the juror being the victim of any crime, this should be done individually before the judge at the bench and not so that all members of the jury panel hear the specifics of the response in open court. This is the practice of the judges of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County.

In Baltimore County, we pride ourselves on making jury duty a positive experience both in terms of how jurors are treated and the efficiency of how jurors are utilized.

Citizens should know that Mr. Simon's jury duty experience is not typical of the treatment of jurors in Baltimore County, and that if problems arise with jury service, complaints are handled by contacting the court at 887-2687.

Peter J. Lally


The writer is court administrator of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County.

Dismayed at Letter

I am writing to express my dismay with The Sun for its inclusion of Richard Lelonek's letter, "A Matter of Style" (July 9). This letter was a blatant personal attack on Samuel L. Banks. The Sun should have kept such a distasteful letter in the envelope in which it was delivered.

What was the true point of Mr. Lelonek's letter? Dr. Banks is an extremely intelligent, articulate, strong, African-American man, and if Mr. Lelonek cannot accept that, then let him keep his jealousy to himself.

Ellyne M. Brown


Unfair to Muslims in America

Your editorial of July 11 is unfair to the American public, American Muslims and in particular to Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman, whom you have called a "troublesome cleric . . . who developed sudden notoriety."

The unfairness to the American public emanates from editors and commentators who write about Islam and its people without any depth of knowledge and familiarity with the subject.

However, to Muslims, the editorial adds to the unjustified and unwarranted wave of hate against them, and to Dr. Abdel-Rahman, because the editorial disapproved of his freedom of speech in this land that was founded on such freedom.

In comparison, the bombing, destruction and obstruction of abortion clinics did not call for the examination of where the perpetrators of these crimes received their religious education nor the church or synagogue which they attended nor the clerics who fomented them. Why, then, should this policy be applied only to Dr. Abdel-Rahman?

Contrary to popular belief, it is not strange for Muslims to attend a particular mosque since very few exist. There are only three mosques in Baltimore compared to approximately 1,200 churches and 70 synagogues.

The same scarcity of mosques applies to the New Jersey-New York area. If Muslims wish to worship, they are limited to the few mosques available to them.

Another injustice to Dr. Abdel-Rahman is that the editorial categorized him as a cleric only and ignores the fact that he is a university professor with a school of thought, who taught at Al-Azhar University, a school which predates Oxford, Cambridge and the American Ivy League collectively.

The man, Dr. Abdel-Rahman, by virtue of his education, research and position has a message to present.

It is important to note that Islam is a way of life and not just a religion. To grasp the passionate upheavals in the Muslim world, one must not forget that Muslim countries were liberated only recently from the most oppressive and damaging colonialism.

Muslims are at a stage of toil to adjust and establish themselves in the world community. We, as Americans, have to bridge the gap between the difficult communities. America can greatly benefit financially and spiritually from the Muslim world, its culture and approach to life.

The editorial further depicts Dr. Abdel-Rahman's attitude toward peace in the Middle East as "enemy of peace." I do not recall your editors using such a derogatory term regarding the Middle East when Mr. Yatzak Shamir and Mr. Moishe Ahrens of Israel refuted the Camp David peace agreements.

We think The Sun, as the only available daily newspaper in Baltimore, owes the community and Dr. Abdel-Rahman a chance to explain his ideas and philosophy of Islamic revival as he perceives it before calling him names.

M. Z. Awad


The Benefits of a Regulated Monopoly

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.