One of the biggest barriers to effective recycling of waste materials has been the lack of a viable market for the materials. All too often, public enthusiasm for "helping the earth" has been --ed by the closing of a recycling center, or the recognition that it costs more to recycle old cans, newspapers, bottles and plastic than it does to dump them.
Running out of existing landfill space, and plagued by leaking pollutants from the bottom of this buried detritus, communities are slowly raising dumping fees to market level. But the blunt economic factors often favor disposing over recycling.
In Anne Arundel County, a task force last year recommended mandatory recycling and trash collection charges based on each household's volume of refuse. It recognized that current charges don't provide adequate recycling incentives.
Developing new markets for recycled products is essential to sustain the statewide recycling program, the Governor's Advisory Council on Recycling reported last month. The panel told state and local governments to buy more recycled wares, and to require suppliers to offer them.
But it stopped short of recommending tax incentives or grants or even technical assistance to promote private industry recyclers and recycling, as is being done in other states.
These subsidies for recycling would help to build a foundation for the environmentally desirable program, while economically viable markets expand.
The council also urged greater public education efforts. But without mandatory recycling (and mandatory government collection) or legislation to reduce waste at the source (which the council failed to endorse), education won't accomplish its goal.
Marylanders are already recycling about 19 percent of their solid waste (with some fudge factors). Higher goals could be met by simply expanding curbside collection service, and raising trash disposal rates. What then to do with the collected recyclables remains the big question.
The council has produced, as it claims, a beginning textbook. But it is not a guide to ready action. The 19-member panel is chaired by Harvey Alter, an advocate of incineration and free-market recycling. But the group also includes opposing interests. Still, it could not sort out its differences in three years. Hard decisions remain to be made.