No big winner likely in Unix-Microsoft-IBM battle


May 31, 1993|By PETER H. LEWIS

ATLANTA -- In the spring of 1863, only two armies were vexing Atlanta in what some people here still call the War of Northern Aggression. Last week, three armies were challenging the city's hospitality during the Comdex/Spring computer trade show: Microsoft unfurled its Windows NT battle flags, IBM sent in reinforcements for its OS/2 software, and the grizzled veterans of Unix found some fresh horses to ride.

The combativeness was just one more sign that the personal computer industry is at a crossroads. Microsoft, through DOS and Windows, clearly owns the office desktop today, but despite Windows' huge popularity, the program was designed to run on microprocessors that virtually nobody uses anymore.

Windows does not take advantage of 32-bit microprocessors, which include Intel Corp.'s i386DX and i486DX chips, the workhorses of the typical office. So many corporate information system managers are trying to decide which advanced operating system should be the platform on which to carry their PC operations into the 21st century.

Unlike the Civil War, this battle is unlikely to result in an unconditional winner. As businesses transform their large, centralized information systems into smaller systems of personal computers linked on networks, there may well be room for several different systems within one company.

As a result, many companies are flying the colors of more than one advanced operating system, prepared to embrace whichever one -- Windows NT, OS/2, Unix or some other system not yet visible -- eventually gains the strongest position.

"We love them all equally and hate them all equivalently," said Jim P. Manzi, chairman of Lotus Development Corp., which is developing programs for all the platforms. "Our strategy is operating system agnosticism."

Such agnosticism is not possible for the people who have to decidecorporate computing strategies. In coming months, if they have not done so already, many corporate managers will be evaluating Windows NT, OS/2 version 2.1 and probably some of the Unix variations.

These include Solaris for X86, from Sunsoft Inc.; Nextstep for Intel from Next Inc.; Unixware from Univel, and Open Desktop from the Santa Cruz Operation -- for use on the powerful PCs called servers that act as hubs and information repositories for other personal computers on the network.

Maximum performance

Some desktop PC users, typically the breed who think of themselves as "power users," will be pouncing on the new operating systems in an effort to wring the maximum performance from their machines. Almost every company has a few of these wise guys, who demand the fastest and brawniest PCs. For these users, the queries for a good operating system will be:

* Will it be solid and reliable enough to entrust it with the most important applications?

* Does it have the proper plumbing for use on networks, including security features?

* Does it have the ability to run on a variety of powerful computers, including future generations of microprocessors and computers with multiple processors? Such portability, as it is known, provides users enormous flexibility in choosing hardware.

Other questions include: Will it have a rich set of development tools for people who create applications? Will it have sufficient support among commercial software writers?

If the new operating system is to run on desktop PCs as well as on the more powerful systems called workstations and servers, how much memory and processing power will be needed?

Not for casual users

It wasn't long ago that people made fun of IBM's OS/2 because it required eight megabytes of system memory and 40 megabytes of hard disk space. Some analysts expect that Windows NT and the Unix variants will demand 12 to 16 megabytes of system memory and 50 to 100 megabytes of hard disk space before they will do any useful work. Clearly, with the possible exception of OS/2, these are not operating systems for the casual user.

That group -- the office workers and the executives who are happy with a simple desktop PC or portable computer -- are the civilian noncombatants in this conflict. They may be aware of distant thunder, an occasional bright flash and lots of smoke, but the 32-bit systems have no real impact yet on day-to-day life.

With apologies to "Gone With the Wind," the attitudes of most casual PC users to these ominous activities beyond the horizon seem to range from disassociation ("Fiddle-dee-dee, I'll worry about that tomorrow") to cynicism ("Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn").

But it does matter.

The last major operating system crossroads was passed more than a decade ago when eight-bit personal computers using the CP/M operating system gave way to 16-bit computers running DOS and, more recently, Windows. And the time has now come for those 16-bit systems to give way to an operating system that issues instructions 32 bits at a time.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.