U.S. wants bottled-water labels to be more specific about source of contents

January 01, 1993|By Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON -- The federal government proposed yesterday more stringent standards for bottled-water labels, hoping to clarify for consumers the differences among mineral water, distilled water, spring water and others.

Consumers are entitled to know the source of bottled water, as well as precisely what it contains, the Food and Drug Administration said in announcing the proposals, which become official Tuesday and are expected to become final in six months, following public comment. The actual changes in the labels would occur in about a year.

The agency emphasized that the new rules were not being developed because of any health hazards from bottled water but simply to ensure that the labeling is truthful.

"People should know what they are getting," said FDA Commissioner David A. Kessler. "If the label says it's mineral water, it should be mineral water. If it's from a municipal water source, the water should be so labeled."

The FDA also announced a final regulation that would set a ceiling on the levels of lead and other substances -- such as copper, certain pesticides and other chemicals -- that are permissible in bottled water to ensure that it is at least as safe as regular tap water.

Under that regulation, lead in bottled water could not exceed five parts per billion. The Environmental Protection Agency permits 15 parts per billion in public water systems.

The FDA standards are more strict than the EPA's because lead leaches into tap water from distribution pipes, while "there is no distribution piping in the bottled-water system," an FDA official said.

The $2 billion-a-year bottled-water industry -- which had petitioned for tougher regulations -- is expected to welcome the changes.

"These regulations will provide a comprehensive federal structure . . . and assure consumers their bottled water meets the highest quality standards," said Sylvia Swanson, executive vice president of the International Bottled Water Association.

It is generally believed that bottled water is safe, but the congressional watchdog General Accounting Office urged the FDA in 1991 to set stricter standards. In addition, the House Energy and Commerce Committee, the chairman of which is Rep. John D. Dingell, a Michigan Democrat, was considering whether to draft legislation that would impose new standards.

The proposed regulation defines mineral water, for example, as water that contains at least 250 parts per million in total dissolved minerals and water that has come from a source "tapped at one or more bore holes or springs, originating from a geologically and physically protected underground water source."

The proposed rules also stipulate that water labeled "spring" must come from an underground formation from which water flows naturally to the surface or would if it were not collected underground. "Spring" water would have to be collected at the spring or through a bore hole next to the point where it emerges, the FDA said.

"Artesian" water must come from an artesian well in which subterranean pressure pushes the water at least part way toward the surface.

Carbonated waters, such as tonic, soda water, club soda and seltzer, are exempt because they are considered soft drinks. But carbonated mineral waters are not.

The proposals also say that bottled water coming from a municipal water supply must say so on the label.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.