Bush, with Modest Agenda, Hurt by What He Didn't Do

August 16, 1992|By KAREN HOSLER

WASHINGTON — Washington. -- After three and half years as president, George Bush is probably best remembered for what he didn't do.

That's especially true on the issue his re-election campaign acknowledges as America's all-consuming priority: the shattered economy.

"It's a drift presidency," observed Keith Olson, a professor of American history at the University of Maryland. "He failed to identify the problem early, and he never explained to people, 'If not me, then someone else will have to deal with it, because the country must face it.' "

Mr. Bush didn't promise to be an activist. He just said he'd point his horse in the same direction Ronald Reagan had, keeping the economy strong and the nation at peace. The Bush difference, he said, would be a "kinder, gentler" ride and there'd be "no new taxes."

But as he prepares to claim the Republican Party's nomination for a second term, the misfortune of the Bush presidency so far is that he couldn't even deliver on that meager agenda. A cautious man seeking only custodial duties, Mr. Bush could neither maintain the status quo in what turned out to be a time of global upheaval nor develop the more aggressive approach that a rapidly changing nation demanded.

"The context changed dramatically after the first couple years of his term, and the president is now out of sync with the country," observed Thomas E. Mann, director of Governmental Studies at the Brookings Institution. "We developed a longing for an activist leader, and this president wasn't well-suited for that."

Over his term, Mr. Bush emerged as a careful manager who could skillfully negotiate a crisis, such as the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. But he showed no vision for addressing the country's long-term problems and no set of overriding principles.

"He's the type of person who runs for office, but doesn't know what he wants to do with that office once he gets there," said James Thurber, director for the Center on Congressional and Presidential Studies at The American University.

But before the economy hit bottom last year, Mr. Bush's tenure was generally regarded as successful.

Major new environmental and civil rights legislation was enacted. Government help was provided for child care, and Mr. Bush completed negotiations for a free trade agreement with Canada and Mexico.

"Considering how bad his numbers were in Congress, with fewer members of his own party there than almost any president this century, he got a lot of things done," insists John H. Sununu, who served as Mr. Bush's chief of staff until last December and guided most of the domestic policy work.

Mr. Bush was more personally involved and inclined to take bolder action on the international front -- partly because he didn't need congressional approval but also because there were fewer ideological sensitivities to contend with there.

Yet, Mr. Bush's relative success on foreign policy has only made recession-weary Americans more eager for their president's attention to the problems at home. "They recall George Bush from Desert Storm; the resolute, decisive leader who accomplished a great victory," said Vince Breglio, a Republican pollster. "They can't reconcile that image of George Bush with the domestic president who says he is not able to accomplish anything because of Congress."

There is no consensus on what Mr. Bush could have done differently to treat an economic downturn that was the inevitable hangover from a binge of government and corporate borrowing during the 1980s.

But he insisted for so long that things were not as bad as they seemed that people began to wonder if he was so isolated in his world of privilege that he just didn't get it.

"The cumulative effect of all the pictures of him on golf courses and in speed boats was to suggest he was a lot more in touch with country club Republicans than the K-Mart Republicans, who were really former Democrats that voted for him," said Gary Bauer, a domestic policy adviser in the Reagan White House. "I think they figured these were not folks who understood how they lived."

Many of those who fault Mr. Bush for failing to be more of an activist on domestic issues say he should have taken advantage the enormous good will he enjoyed during the aftermath of the Persian Gulf war to take serious steps to strengthen a fragile economy.

In a triumphant address to Congress in March of 1991, the president called for speedy action only on a routine highway spending bill and a still-languishing anti-crime measure.

He had tried to soften the blow of recession with a 1990 budget agreement, breaking his tax pledge in return for a plan to reduce federal spending. But that wasn't enough, as it turned out, to lift the weight of the deficit from the economy, and the year-long confrontation left the president badly bruised, both personally and politically.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.