My heart aches at the tragedy of John Richard Gregory and his adoptive parents.
John's parents are suing the state because they were not told that his biological mother had used drugs during pregnancy. After years of serious behavior problems, for which his parents were unprepared, John is now institutionalized.
Ironically, the day after John's story appeared, The Sun reported that cocaine-exposed babies don't suffer permanent damage. With early, comprehensive intervention, these babies can be saved.
So, too, with John. If his parents had been told the truth and if John had received the early intervention services he needed, he might now be in high school, facing a bright future rather than being locked away, out-of-state.
Tragedies like John's can be avoided.
The adoption law must be changed to require that a family genetic/health history be obtained, including information about maternal drug or alcohol abuse during pregnancy.
Child welfare workers must be trained to obtain and record these histories.
The law must require full disclosure of the family health/genetic history to adoptive parents. Adoptive parents, in turn, should be referred to a genetic counselor when they have questions about the implications for the child of the family health/genetic history, including maternal drug and alcohol abuse.
Last, but not least, early comprehensive services must be provided to the child and the new family.
Julia B. Rauch
The writer, an associate professor at the University of Maryland at Baltimore, coordinates the Ad Hoc Interprofessional Committee on Genetics and Adoption.
As a resident of Federal Hill and a member of the Federal Hill Neighborhood Association, I am surprised to read of the re-opening of the building-permit case against Lane Berk's rooftop sculpture.
Having lived in the neighborhood for seven years and often walking up and down its streets, I do not believe that this sculpture can be seen from the street.
In fact, I am not aware that this is a neighborhood issue as, to the best of my knowledge, it has never been discussed at any association meeting nor have I ever heard it raised as a topic of discussion in conversations in the park, on the street, at social gatherings, etc. In short, had The Sun not provided extensive coverage, I would not be aware that there is an alleged violation and major neighborhood problem.
In my opinion, the "issue" is one of freedom of personal expression with no violation of neighborhood integrity. I believe that Mrs. Berk should be commended for her effort to bring art to downtown Baltimore and to celebrate Baltimore's renaissance by reproducing one of its earliest symbols.
It would seen that this case has been thoroughly studied and sufficient time given by city government evaluating it. I urge the zoning board to dismiss this negative new appeal with dispatch.
Shame on George Bush and Dan Quayle for their persistence in the old way of thinking that believes that environmental interests and those of business and industry must be in opposition.
The Bush/Quayle persistence in destroying the environment and sabotaging the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro is both foolish and short sighted. In fact, more and more people are recognizing that successful industrial growth will only happen when the growth adopts sound ecological and environmental principles.
I recently attended a conference at which the cief executive officers of Browning-Ferris Industries, Baxter-Traenol and the 3M Company spoke. For them, applying eco-consciousness in their companies led to financial savings through recycling and cutting waste, inspired employees to develop new products, and helped maintain the competitive edge with customers who are seeking save products.
Additionally, they recognized the most important fact of all, namely that a polluted plant with damaged and destroyed life support systems is bad for everyone, and that we live in an an inter-connected and inter-dependent world.
Dan K. Morhaim
Shame on Perot
I was glad to see that pseudo-candidate Ross Perot finally took a stand. He came out against presidential motorcades, against playing "Hail To The Chief," against public officials flying on government planes, and for "the people of America working together."
I only wonder whether he thinks those pronouncements will silence his critics who claim he is unable or unwilling to come up with a specific agenda to deal with the problems facing this country.
Shame on him. The utter shallowness of his populist posturing raises the Bush/Dukakis debate over the flag to the level of the Federalist Papers.
At the rate he's going, I doubt Mr. Perot will come up with something as substantive as Willie Horton, let alone a coherent policy on how to improve the economy.
I can't believe the people of America are taking him seriously. Are we that politically bankrupt?