County Executive Robert R. Neall's cry for a smaller government is drowning in a chorus of desperate voices.
Battered wives seeking shelter, veteran workers scared of being put on the street, court masters beleaguered by too many juvenile cases -- all took their place before the County Council last week, begging to be spared the slash of Neall's budget scalpel.
By the end of the week, council members were promising to persuade Neall to restore money for certain social programs and the jobs of up to 88 county workers in his $634 million operating budget.
Philosophically, council members agree that government no longer can be all things to all people. But they differ markedly on the practical issue of which people must be left out in the cold, and when.
"A lot of people like the idea of downsizing, but this package just wasn't presented right by the administration," said Councilwoman Virginia P. Clagett, a West River Democrat. "I didn't think it was done fairly at all.
"It's too much," she said. "It isn't necessary. In the long term, downsizing is something government has got to address, but we are flush in this county compared to our neighbors. We are very lucky, and I don't think we should [lay off] our employees so they're lining the streets."
A majority of the seven council members say they are upset primarily by four issues:
* The elimination of the Careers Center in Crownsville, which provides training and education for about 100 juvenile delinquents a year. Discontinuing the center would save $330,000.
"I want you to know that if the county doesn't fund this program, nobody else will. These children will fall through the cracks," Erica Joyce Wolfe told the council last week. "If we don't pay for it now, we will pay for it later.
* Cutting $45,890 from the YWCA Woman's Center's battered spouse counseling and shelter program. The cut represents 16 percent of a $294,000 budget for a program that provided counseling to 413 people and shelter for 318 women and children during a recent 12-month period.
Neall also cut $30,000 for battered spouse legal services.
In last week's emotional testimony, battered wives sobbed as they told council members how the program helped them.
"You're cutting people and families who are rebuilding their lives," said one of the women. "You're taking away the only life jacket they may get."
* The layoff of at least 38 workers whose jobs are being abolished. Neall has eliminated 88 county jobs, but 40 workers could have their positions transferred to the private sector.
* School funding. Neall proposed a school budget of $347.9 million, $14.3 million more than last year. Still, school supporters complain that the proposed budget is $17.9 million less than what the Board of Education requested. At two public hearings last week, about 350 parents requested full funding of the school budget.
Council members, who must approve a budget by May 29, may add to the school budget, but not to any other department. If they want to restore the 88 jobs and money for the Careers Center and battered women, they must either exert pressure on Neall to include them through the supplemental budget process, or hope he's heard enough public comment to restore them on his own.
"I'm perfectly willing to listen to anything they propose," Neall said Friday.
He said he already is reconsidering restoring at least part of the money for the battered spouse program, after meeting with YWCA representatives last week and receiving a petition signed by 2,000 supporters of the program.
This week, Neall is scheduled to discuss funding for the Careers Center with Judge Robert H. Heller Jr. and juvenile court masters. Though he still believes juvenile justice falls under state auspices, he said he is considering saving the center.
L Neall says he will not renege on other budget cuts, however.
The elimination of the $30,850 executive director for the Anne Arundel Commission for Women is a "good cut" that could end up being used to restore funding for the battered women's program to its former level, Neall said.
He also remains firm on his decision to eliminate the 88 jobs. And his top priority -- a $10 million "rainy day fund" -- is "chiseled in stone."
Clearly, the council is going to have to be "a little more innovative" than simply raiding the rainy day fund in negotiating with Neall to restore the cuts, said County Auditor Joseph Novotny.
Neall desperately wants the fund as insurance against the kind of fiscal crisis he faced last year. Most council members support the concept of a savings account -- if not the $10 million amount -- but even those who don't say they are eyeing a number of Neall's pet capital projects more than the rainy day fund.