Repeal of boat-user fee nears Phase-out measure is tied to other bill.

March 03, 1992|By Louise Palmer | Louise Palmer,States News Service Carol Emert of States News Service contributed to this article.

WASHINGTON -- A congressional committee has brought the unpopular recreational boat-user fee one step closer to repeal by attaching an amendment to another bill to phase out the tax over five years.

The House Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee moved last week to jettison the tax by adding the repeal amendment to a shipbuilding bill that would induce other nations to put a halt to shipyard subsidies.

The tax could affect 106,865 boats in Maryland, a state Department of Natural Resources spokesman said yesterday.

Boat-user fee repeal has overwhelming support in the House of Representatives, which approved a resolution last year 412-6 against the tax, which has been collected on a limited basis since November. The Senate also voted to repeal it.

The tax varies with the size of the vessel, ranging from $25 to $100 a year.

Attempts by the sponsor of the repeal, Michigan Republican Rep. Robert Davis, to lobby the White House on the issue failed when President Bush did not address boat-user fees in his 1993 budget proposal.

Under the Davis amendment, being co-sponsored by Maryland Republican Rep. Helen Delich Bentley, the revenues lost by the repeal would be made up with a fee for a new data base service that would be used by shippers.

The boat-user fees brought in $7.3 million between Nov. 1 and Feb. 14. The Office of Management and Budget had projected revenues of $180 million a year when the tax was approved by Congress in 1990.

Most of the estimated 4.1 million recreational boaters in the United States subject to the tax have avoided paying the fee because the Coast Guard "let everyone know" it would check only vessels stopped for inspection or for questioning on other violations, says Sue Waldren, spokeswoman for the Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee.

The repeal was introduced with the new financing provisions to bolster the chances of its passage and avert stalling by the Bush administration, Ms. Waldren says.

"I support it, but not with a great deal of enthusiasm," says Mrs. Bentley, a member of the committee. "But it's such an aggravating tax, it's better to get rid of it than to have everybody screaming about it."

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.