City wins a round in water dispute Court upholds arbitration panel. Bill hits $11 million.

January 27, 1992|By Larry Carson

An arbitration panel's ruling that Baltimore County owes the city $10.2 million in a long-running water-rate dispute has been upheld in Baltimore County Circuit Court -- with one difference.

The county's bill now has grown to $11 million, including 6 percent interest, according a statement issued today by Mayor Kurt L. Schmoke.

County attorney Lee Parks said today he has not discussed the Jan. 14 decision by Judge John F. Fader 2nd with Baltimore County Executive Roger B. Hayden so it still is unclear if the county will appeal further.

However, Mr. Parks acknowledged that interest charges are building.

If the county decides to pay the money, it could not be used to ease the city's operating budget woes, since it must go into the self-supporting fund that pays for city water and sewer services. Despite that, city officials have said the money could help postpone any future water rate increases.

Similarly, the money, if paid by the county without further appeal, also would not hurt the county's stressed operating budget, since it would come from a separate water and sewer fund.

The arbitration panel decision came on Aug. 22, which marked a decisive point in a 13-year argument between city and county officials over the water rates paid to the city, which maintains the metropolitan area water system.

The city operates and owns three reservoirs in the county, and also provides piped water to some parts of Howard and Anne Arundel counties. Howard and Anne Arundel were not involved in this dispute.

The city hired a consultant in 1978 who said the rates charged the county were too low, compared with city costs of operating the system. The case dragged on in discussion for years, despite a section in the 1924 agreement governing the relationship, which calls for arbitration of such disputes.

Finally, in 1987, former Mayor Clarence Du Burns filed suit against the county to force the arbitration to begin, and the Court of Appeals finally ruled in the city's favor, saying arbitration should proceed.

The arbitration panel made the award of money effective to July 1, 1983, and interest of 6 percent per year was applied, starting last Oct. 22.

The county has until mid-February to appeal Judge Fader's ruling to the Court of Special Appeals.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.