Cardin seeks support on 'lemon law' for puppies

November 07, 1991|By Tom Bowman | Tom Bowman,Washington Bureau of The Sun

WASHINGTON -- Max-a-million had a deprived puppyhood.

Raised in squalor and neglect at a Nebraska "puppy mill," the 4-year-old cocker spaniel wound up in Baltimore. But his sorry Midwestern life haunted him -- and his owner -- through health problems that required three bladder operations.

Max-a-million is his name "because that's what he's costing me," said Theresa Pulice-Wingate yesterday. The 28-year-old Baltimore woman's "nightmare" began 2 1/2 years ago and included a $2,500 veterinarian's bill. The black cocker was given to her by a woman who bought him from a West Virginia pet store and was about to have him put to sleep.

And Petie, a 7-month-old Shih Tzu from Crofton, has also had a dog's life.

Purchased from an Annapolis pet store in July, Petie has water on the brain and has cost his owner, Donna Wynkoop, some $700 in vet bills so far. Now he needs $600 in tests, and she can't afford them. "It may get worse, it may get better," said Ms. Wynkoop, 21, holding the small fuzzy dog with pink ribbons.

Max-a-million and Petie have plenty of canine company, according to investigations by the Humane Society of the United States.

Some 90 percent of dogs sold through pet stores were raised in so-called "puppy mills," places where the animals are kept in poor conditions to cut costs, the society found. Mostly located in the Midwest, the dogs from the mills often are victims of filth, overcrowding, insufficient food and water, incessant breeding lTC and lack of veterinary care. Arriving at pet stores, they may be sick and lack the happy temperment of a pet.

Representative Benjamin L. Cardin, D-Md.-3rd, hopes to curtail such puppy-mill practices. The Baltimore congressman is pushing a bill that would make dog owners who purchase their pets from stores or breeders eligible for refunds up to three times the cost of the animal in order to pay for high veterinarian bills -- should they decide to keep the pet. They also would be able to exchange the dog for another or get a refund.

Consumers could take action within 14 days of the purchase for any illness or anti-social behavior of the dog. They would have up to two years to take action if a licensed veterinarian determined the dog had a congenital or hereditary disorder.

"This is the federal 'lemon law' for puppies," Mr. Cardin said yesterday, flanked by Max-a-million and Petie, who scratched, sniffed each other and growled at photographers. The congressman said he expects the measure will force the puppy mills either to change their ways or go out of business.

But officials in the pet industry disputed the figures used by the Humane Society and the need for the proposed law.

Marshall Meyers, general counsel for the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council, a trade association for pet stores, estimated that only 5 percent to 10 percent -- rather than 90 percent -- of stores buy from "substandard" suppliers. "It does not make sense for a pet store to sell sick animals," he said.

Mr. Meyers said that only about 6 percent -- some 400,000 -- of the dogs sold annually in the United States are sold by pet stores, where the cost of a dog usually ranges from $300 to $400. Most people buy dogs through newspaper ads placed by commercial breeders or those who have a litter to sell, he said.

"I really question whether this is a federal matter," said Mr. Meyers, who noted that puppy protection laws are in force or pending in nine states. Maryland is not among them.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.