Save the CollegesEditor: Civic and political reactions to...


October 18, 1991

Save the Colleges

Editor: Civic and political reactions to the proposed $450-million cuts in the state budget have been full of anguish, anger and some expressions of animosity.

It is welcome that the legislature is now moving forward to participate in the challenge to ensure a balanced budget through meaningful adjustments.

In the outcry, quite a few concerns have been raised.

Let me add my own to that list -- higher education.

This decade's tremendous political changes have been accompanied, or will soon be followed, by serious economic, technological and scientific challenges.

Higher education will greatly assist in our meeting those challenges adequately both at the state and national levels.

Incumbent on Governor Schaefer and the General Assembly is the maximum implementation, therefore, of their 1988 program to strengthen and elevate higher education.

L We, and posterity, will thank them for this far-sightedness.

Hardev S. Palta.



Editor: Issue No. 1: Does the end justify the means?

Conservatives defend and liberals decry Oliver North's tactics in the Iran-contra scandal. Conservatives say the end justifies the means; liberals disagree.

Now, each group moves 180 degrees on the matter of a Democrat staffer supposedly leaking Anita Hill's statement to the press. Liberals say the end justifies the means; conservatives say it does not.

Issue No. 2: Nothing to hide?

Frequently, liberals criticize and conservatives defend the growth of police powers (even to the extent of entering one's private domain), the defense being based on the old, ''If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about.''

Yet now, conservatives object to the idea of an ''innocent'' Judge Thomas having to answer accusatory questions, and liberals say, ''He must have something to hide, or he wouldn't object so much.''

It kind of makes one question how deep any of their beliefs in their principles are.

Brian D. Taylor.


It's Time to Share

Editor: John F. Kennedy once implored us not to ask what our country can do for us, but what we can do for our country. George Bush expressed a related sentiment with his ''thousand points of light.'' As the state budget shortfall increases daily, perhaps it is time to consider the wisdom of such statements.

Are there not enough wealthy corporations and individuals in Baltimore City and all the counties of Maryland to erase all or a large portion of the budget shortfall and therefore maintain essential services to the citizens of Maryland?

But who are the wealthy? One criterion we might consider is our need, for I believe we are not justified in keeping more than we need while others are in need.

Let corporations and individuals assess their needs honestly, then contact Gov. William Donald Schaefer, Mayor Kurt L. Schmoke or a county executive and pledge $1,000, $10,000 or $100,000. Experience the joy of giving with abandon.

There is so much money in the world just sitting in accounts earning more money which just sits in accounts. Is it not time to rearrange our priorities, even slightly? By so doing the Free State just might set a shining example for the rest of America as those who have share more generously with those who have not.

Al Fassler.


Readers Comment on the Thomas Hearings

Editor: To all those who were shocked at the confirmation of Judge Clarence Thomas, I ask, "Why?" After all, he was judged by a jury of his peers.

Joseph Bondar.


Editor: The biggest joke of the Thomas hearings to me was the fact that Sen. Edward Kennedy was sitting in judgment of him. The wolf watching the sheep.

Joseph C. Matassa.


Editor: Women who worked with Judge Thomas portrayed him as a man whose conduct was above reproach, who never told dirty jokes and who "looked down at his shoes when other men craned their necks to look at a woman."

Perhaps our senators could learn a lesson in respecting women from the judge.

Maria Garriott.


Editor: Who knows what evil lies in the hearts of men?

! Anita Hill knows.

S. Banks.


Editor: The British often use the expression "smarmy" when they speak derogatorily of someone. I believe Sen. Joe Biden defines the word to perfection.

His performance in the Clarence Thomas affair was nauseating at best. At worst, he typified the gutless members of Congress who, when confronted with a male/female issue, automatically take the female side out of fear of the female lobby.

George B. Gammie.


Editor: The Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill inquiry is a classic example why confirmations for the Supreme Court should be decided by a two-thirds majority vote.

The Republicans, led by Senators Spector and Hatch, went for the jugular and won. The Democrats, led by the chairman, Senator Biden, took the defensive position and lost, proving the truth of the late Leo Durocher's assertion that "nice guys finish last."

Albert E. Denny.


Editor: I opposed the nomination of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.