Layoffs in Howard?

March 05, 1991

Barely four months after the election that was supposed to have thrown out the tax-and-spenders in Howard County, union members are imploring residents and business leaders to ask County Executive Ecker to tax and spend.

Ecker will be a hard sell; the county executive was swept into office, after all, by a wave of anti-government sentiment. Now, faced with dwindling revenues and simultaneously fighting to head off a taxpayer's revolt, he has announced a plan to cut the budget by 16 percent, lay off at least 200 government employees -- one out of every nine county workers -- and keep 100 currently unfilled positions vacant.

The county's unions charge that such deep cuts will compromise critical health and safety across the board. Ecker has responded with partisan finger-pointing, criticizing his Democratic predecessor, Elizabeth Bobo, for spending too much. But the fact remains, Ecker's plan will leave 300 positions unfilled -- one-sixth of the county's jobs. There is no way that many positions can remain vacant without compromising services.

Ecker's hope lies in legislative approval of a plan to temporarily abandon a state mandate for school spending which, in Howard County's case, is bloated by 6 percent raises. Ecker sensibly proposes that teachers' COLAs, like those of all other county employees, be deferred. Yet even if the executive wins this point, the anticipated $8 million in savings would help, but it would not close the revenue gap.

So it comes down to this: Do the people of Howard County want high levels of services continued? Howard County employees, TC who are fighting a personal as well as political battle, are fortunate in being able to appeal to property owners who can, if they choose, afford to foot the bill.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.