Maryland has become a 'state of hate'
If you think your home is your castle, think again. Violent crime has become a way of life in Baltimore. Maryland has become the state of hate.
Blame it on the social and economic problems that our elected officials should have done something about a long time ago. Now that they are unable to deal with the problems they were elected to resolve, they want to have "another gun ban." Is this called passing the buck?
I never thought the free state of Maryland would come to the point where it would decide what law-abiding citizens cannot possess to defend our homes and loved ones. If the barber who was killed in Waverly, or the young man from Crofton who was killed in Charles Center, had had a gun, any type of gun, maybe they would still be alive today. As stated in your newspaper on May 1, 1990, two of the top five crime guns in America are the Raven 25 and the Jennings 22. Please note these are not assault weapons.
Please, Governor Schaefer, do not punish law-abiding citizens with another gun ban just because it would further enhance your reputation as the number one political leader on this issue.
I want the right to defend myself, my family and my home with any type of gun I choose.
Regarding Dorothy Bailey's letter (Forum, Feb. 18), I have found toll collectors in Maryland to be nearly universally very polite and efficient. I have never presented a toll collector with unusually large bills, and I have never failed to say please and thank you when dealing with one.
I do have a legitimate complaint about the system, however. Maryland and Delaware issue receipts printed with disappearing ink (thermal printers). At the end of the year I wind up with stacks of blank pieces of paper. I sure hope the IRS understands.
J. B. Anderson
Members of the media are guilty of careless reporting that is endangering the lives of our young men and women in the Persian Gulf. Since our troops were deployed there in August there has been evidence of countless media violations of our national security. Many journalists go beyond reporting the news and include editorial comment intended to influence national policy and even military strategy.
I am deeply disturbed with the members of the media who are attempting to make a "Hollywood production" out of Desert Storm, which is a very serious conflict. Freedom of the press is indeed important to all Americans, but it must be accompanied by ethical behavior and prudent judgment. Too many journalists have demonstrated that they are more concerned with personal ego and "ratings" than they are with the welfare of our troops.
Americans are concerned with the unethical behavior of the press and believe that the Pentagon should tighten its control over the press. We all recognize that accurate and timely reports are vital to the public interest. But such reports must be handled prudently so that the lives of our fighting forces are not put in jeopardy by media carelessness, negligence or poor timing of press releases.
Thomas C. Carroll
Year of the Infant
I would like to clarify some information in Laura Lippman's Jan. 31 article detailing Maryland's Year of the Infant. Obviously, the implementation of 30 initiatives does not warrant the classification of a "few."
Furthermore, under the listing of initiatives that were scrapped, the following needs correction:
Baby showers are being held regionally and sponsored by the American Lung Association.
"Baby Bucks" will be implemented during 1991 in conjunction with WJZ-TV and Blue Cross and Blue Shield to encourage pregnant women to receive prenatal care.
"Cabinet Cares" was completed January 1990. All cabinet and deputy cabinet members performed community service activities relative to infants and toddlers.
WIC outreach was held throughout 1990, increasing enrollment from 60,501 to 68,805.
"Healthy Mother/Healthy Baby" prenatal care calendar was distributed in October 1990 to a targeted population through the Baltimore City Health Department.
The Year of the Infant is an ongoing project that will continue to focus on prevention and early intervention.
Nancy S. Grasmick
The writer is special secretary of the Maryland Office for Children, Youth and Families.
The editorial "Reform, not regression" (Feb. 18) calls a bill sponsored by Sen. Mary Boergers "silly" because it would deny bail in a first-degree murder case if proof of guilt is evident or the presumption of guilt is evident. To the contrary, your editorial is silly and its thinking is responsible for the criminal in-justic system we have today.