Iraqi, Soviets agree on peace plan U.S. OFFICIAL CALLS PROPOSAL 'UNACCEPTABLE' Bush now faces danger of split within coalition WAR IN THE GULF

February 22, 1991|By Mark Matthews and Karen Hosler | Mark Matthews and Karen Hosler,Washington Bureau of The Sun Paul West of The Sun's Washington Bureau contributed to this article.

WASHINGTON -- The Soviet Union announced last night that the Kremlin and Baghdad had agreed on a way to end the Persian Gulf war that would require Iraq to withdraw its forces from Kuwait "on a fixed time frame" with withdrawal to begin after a cease-fire.

The White House said President Bush had "serious concerns about several points" in the plan, but it did not elaborate. The United States would consult with its coalition partners and analyze the plan further, but in the meantime the war would continue, spokesman Marlin Fitzwater said.

Later, after an hour-and-40- minute meeting between Mr. Bush and his senior national security advisers, the Associated Press quoted an unnamed senior administration official as saying that the proposal was "clearly unacceptable to the United States."

Among a series of conditions that posed a serious dilemma for the United States, the plan called for dropping all United Nations-imposed economic sanctions before the withdrawal was completed and ending all corresponding Security Council resolutions afterward.

The plan, which could possibly drive a wedge between the countries with the biggest military commitment and their less-enthusiastic supporters, came as the United States and its allies were intensifying artillery action in preparation for an all-out ground war. At least one knowledgeable senator said it would be difficult for President Bush to launch a ground war now.

The Soviet-Iraqi agreement represented the first clear policy split on the Persian Gulf crisis between the superpowers since Aug. 3, when their two foreign ministers issued a joint denunciation of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait the day before.

At a televised Moscow news conference, Kremlin spokesman Vitaly Ignatenko said that Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz had delivered a "positive" response to Soviet President Mikhail S. Gorbachev's peace proposal, put forward Monday, and said the two countries had concluded that it was "possible to find a way out of the military conflict."

The Soviets were expected to brief the U.N. Security Council on the plan today, the Associated Press reported.

U.N. Secretary-General Javier Perez de Cuellar refused to comment on the Soviet-Iraqi agreement and avoided reporters as he left U.N. headquarters in New York yesterday through a basement.

Mr. Bush's top national security advisers assembled at the White House after the Soviet announcement.

Mr. Bush was telephoned by Mr. Gorbachev at 6:47 p.m., and the two spoke for 33 minutes. While the president outlined his concerns, Mr. Fitzwater stressed, the United States has not entered negotiations.

"We haven't asked him to do anything," Mr. Fitzwater said of Mr. Gorbachev, describing the talks as a matter between the Soviets and Iraq.

"We have had our hopes raised before" by peace plans that, after serious examination, turned out to have "significant problems," Mr. Fitzwater said.

He said the ground war remained under consideration. Asked whether the United States remained insistent on full compliance with Security Council resolutions, he said that that was still "a goal we seek."

The president left later last night to attend a play at Ford's Theater, "The Black Eagles."

He then held a late-night meeting with his senior national security officials. Afterward, according to the Associated Press, the unnamed official said, "The main conclusion is that the Soviet proposal represents a conditional withdrawal, which is clearly beyond the scope of the U.N. resolutions.

"The Soviet call for lifting of economic sanctions and lifting the U.N. resolutions amounts to a conditional withdrawal that would be unacceptable to the United States."

He said that administration officials were communicating that conclusion to coalition partners and expected to make public comments later today.

Many of the terms of the proposal violated conditions publicly and privately expressed by administration officials in recent days.

Just hours before the announcement, a senior administration official had said that a cease-fire could occur only after a withdrawal was under way. Defense Secretary Dick Cheney warned this week against any pause in the fighting that would merely give the Iraqis the opportunity to regroup and rebuild.

The plan also gave no time period for withdrawal. The White House is reported to be insisting on a four-day withdrawal.

Different translations were offered by the Soviet Foreign Ministry and Western wire services on when the withdrawal would begin. The initial Soviet translation said it would start on the second day after a cease-fire, while the Western translation by Reuters said it would start on the day after a cease-fire. Given concerns about Iraq's ability to regroup its forces, the difference could be important.

The State Department press office said late last night that it did not yethave its own translation.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.