Advertisement

Abortion law's clause under study Health-care worker protections debated

February 20, 1991|By Sandy Banisky

Less than a day after Maryland's new abortion-rights bill was signed into law, the debate continued yesterday over the measure's so-called conscience clause, the portion of the bill meant to hold harmless doctors and nurses who don't believe in abortion.

Two delegates -- Brian K. McHale, D-Baltimore, and Timothy F. Maloney, D-Prince George's -- have drafted bills meant to clarify the wording in the new law.

But the leaders of the House and the Senate do not appear anxious to reopen the contentious abortion debate -- even over so narrow an issue as the conscience clause. And the future of both the McHale and the Maloney proposals is uncertain, both delegates agree.

Advertisement

Maryland law now says that no health-care worker can be forced to perform or participate in an abortion or refer a patient for an abortion. But the new abortion law, scheduled to take effect July 1, deletes the legal protections for health-care workers who will not refer a patient for an abortion.

Abortion-rights advocates say the change is important because it will allow a woman to sue if a doctor refuses to refer her for an abortion that she needs to protect her health.

In their last-ditch fight against the bill, Roman Catholic hospitals and Baltimore Archbishop William H. Keeler protested that the change in the law would leave doctors and nurses who do not XTC believe in abortion open to civil lawsuits by patients or disciplinary action by an employer if they refuse to refer a patient for an abortion.

Dr. Vincent de P. Fitzpatrick, head of obstetrics and gynecology at St. Joseph Hospital, a Catholic institution, said he cannot recall an instance when a woman has filed suit because a health-care worker did not refer her for an abortion.

Still, he said, "in the liability climate here, I think it would be right tohave this protection."

But Attorney General J. Joseph Curran Jr., in a letter to delegates, said that the conscience clause in the new bill will not require anyone to refer a patient for an abortion. Nor, he said, does it remove any legal protections -- except in cases where an abortion is medically advisable and the woman suffered injury because her doctor did not refer her for one.

Yesterday, Mr. McHale said he had lined up several sponsors for a bill that would write the attorney general's explanation into law to make clear that lawsuits could be filed only if the doctor or nurse violated "sound medical practice."

Baltimore Sun Articles
|