Inquiries may undercut Mitchell's House leadership

December 16, 1990|By C. Fraser Smith | C. Fraser Smith,Annapolis Bureau of The Sun

ANNAPOLIS -- Thirty-five new legislators, full of idealism and eagerness, assembled at an orientation session last week to hear words of encouragement from their new leader, House Speaker R. Clayton Mitchell Jr. -- a man now under investigation by state and federal authorities.

Only the day before, allegations of influence-peddling against Mr. Mitchell had been splashed across the front page of the Washington Post.

The occasionally cavalier Eastern Shore Democrat says he was saved some embarrassment by several new freshmen who gave him informal votes of confidence.

"They came up to me and said they supported me," he said. Still, he conceded, the concerns are "in the back of your mind."

Though few specifics of the investigations have been disclosed, federal authorities and the Maryland special prosecutor, Stephen Montanarelli, apparently have been examining a real estate deal in which Mr. Mitchell earned a $100,000 broker's fee. Questions about that deal arose because the land was purchased by Mark Vogel at a time when legislation before the General Assembly benefited the real estate developer and racetrack owner.

Mr. Vogel, whose real estate empire has fallen on hard times, pleaded guilty last month to a narcotics possession charge in Virginia, and he is said to figure in an ongoing federal probe. Recently, he relinquished day-to-day control of his harness tracks in Maryland, which are for sale.

Speaker Mitchell vigorously denies any impropriety in his association with Mr. Vogel, but the suggestion of possible wrongdoing in the land transaction was there for the new delegates to consider before they had even been sworn in.

Veteran legislators say they doubt Mr. Mitchell is in serious trouble, but the inquiries may already have hurt him as a leader of the House.

Several issues the speaker would have pushed in other years will be set aside for this year, legislative sources say.

Any number of issues, large and small, could be affected by the speaker's position as the apparent target of an investigation. Anything that might seem to have an impact on real estate -- and thus on the speaker's real estate interests -- might have to be set aside until the investigations are complete.

With a presumption of innocence still dominant, speculation abounds about the powers perhaps engaged in an attempt to topple the speaker, at least to diminish his power.

Some of Mr. Mitchell's constituents wondered last week if Gov. William Donald Schaefer was after the speaker -- because a majority of Eastern Shore voters went against the governor in the recent election.

More specifically, Mr. Mitchell is known to oppose tax increases suggested by R. Robert Linowes and his study commission. Mr. Schaefer is known to favor many, if not all, of the Linowes proposals. Is the pressure designed to neutralize the speaker's opposition? Will similar pressure arise around other issues?

The speaker denies it, but associates say these questions and speculations leave him preoccupied, somewhat unfocused and "paranoid." He has suggested to friends that members or would-be members of his leadership group -- committee chairmen, committee vice chairmen or Democratic Party floor leaders -- are out to get him. Without being specific, he has said he thinks the "jealousy" of people who feel slighted by him have led to leaked stories about the investigation.

For a time, sources say, he thought Delegate Charles J. Ryan, D-Prince George's, chairman of the Appropriations Committee and a close legislative friend, was preparing to take over as speaker if he was indicted. Friends say that this particular suspicion has begun to subside.

"I told him," one of his friends said, " 'Clayton, if you don't stop looking over your shoulder, you're going to run into something.' "

The looking may not stop altogether until the special prosecutor exonerates him or brings charges.

Legislators are likely be supportive of a powerful leader -- someone whose good will can profoundly help or hurt a career in the Assembly -- and that is the case now with Mr. Mitchell.

Delegate Robert J. DiPietro, D-Prince George's -- who was defeated in the recent election and will not return to the Assembly -- assumes that the prosecutor has found nothing.

"If there were something terribly wrong, it would have popped up by now," he said. No one can know, though, because the prosecutor has said nothing. He has not even interviewed Mr. Mitchell.

"It looks like a witch hunt," says Delegate John J. Bishop, R-Baltimore County. Mr. Bishop observes that he has disagreed with Mr. Mitchell on a range of issues, but he thinks a suggestion of unethical association in the land deal involving Mr. Vogel is far-fetched.

What Mr. Mitchell fears most was expressed by a Baltimor legislator who spoke only on the condition that he not be named. This legislator said he expects the prosecutor to find something substantive.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.