'Gloom' experts offer their words on investments


October 28, 1990|By Thomas Easton | Thomas Easton,New York Bureau of The Sun

New York -- They are the gloomiest of the gloomsters, and they have been that way long enough not only to write books on the subject, but also to get them on the shelves, thus predating the current crunch.

The titles speak for themselves: "Blood on the Streets," "The Economic Time Bomb," "Crash . . . Will it Strike Again?" "Recession or Depression?" and "Surviving the Great Depression of 1990." Though their arguments differ, they all believe the reservations expressed in their books hold true today.

With their own money -- a test as relevant as any other -- they suggested in interviews last week that they are either highly cautious, parking it mostly in cash, or aggressively pessimistic, with investment strategies premised on further declines in the value of U.S. banks and real estate, as well as overseas markets.

Happily, none mentioned stocking up on canned food, an investment that is not only liquid but edible, and therefore the ultimate deflationary hedge. And as one, "Economic Time Bomb" author Harry Browne, asserted, "My feeling is the situation is a great deal more grave than people are talking about . . . [but] nobody can predict the future. No one can forecast with any regularity that can be profitable. I've been in the business for 25 years; I have seen a lot of things come and go, including my own hot streaks."

Indeed, pessimism has been rife, and wrong, before. Queen Elizabeth I inherited a government undermined by debt, corruption and errant military ventures, but a worldwide empire would follow, and the monarchy, along with a stable government, continues four centuries later. In the United States at the end of World War II, retailing was weak, computers almost unknown, and meat scarce. But the retailers that were most cautious undermined their own franchises, the popularity of computers grew almost as fast as their ability to solve problems, and meat became so abundant and economical that it serves as the filling for fast food outlets spread throughout the world. Muddling through intractable problems has precedent, though the legacy of ill-timed forecasts of despair may be equaled by contrasting assertions of ongoing prosperity.

And because the economic outlook today is at best uncertain, those who loudly proclaimed skepticism during the infectiously optimistic days of the last decade have the cachet that comes with prescience.

The most publicized of this school has been Dr. Ravi Batra, whose 1988 book "Surviving the Great Depression of 1990" followed "The Great Depression of 1990." Unusual for such fare, both ended up on best-seller lists but were highly controversial not only because of their conclusions but also because of their statistical methodology.

Mr. Batra said his money is mostly parked in money market funds, with a little used recently for the purchase of gold. "Anything is risky at this time," he said.

"In nine months," he said, "a recession will become a depression." Instead of paper money, which he believes will become worthless, he said it is "time to buy gold coins." Some type of gold standard, he added, will return.

Perhaps the best gauge of an author's sentiment is the direction of his next publication. "Now that communism has fallen," said Mr. Batra, "I think capitalism will fall in this decade. I'm going to write a book on what will replace them."

An unusually eloquent book in the crisis school is James Dale Davidson and William Rees-Mogg's "Blood in the Streets," published in 1987. It predicted a collapse in communism and real estate and was widely derided, when reviewed at all, in the press. An investment fund the authors hoped to set up based on the ideas in their book foundered, Mr. Davidson said, based on lack of support in the brokerage industry.

Now, he's set to launch another to be named Carpathian Capital, after the ship that picked up the survivors of the Titanic. "I've been doing close readings of past depressions, and I think a lot of money will be made," he said.

At the moment, his own investment portfolio is based more around not owning assets than owning them. No. 1 on the list is real estate, of which he is devoid except for a sentimental stake in a family ranch. Shares are second. "Any rebound [in the stock market] is a time to sell short," Mr. Davidson said, referring to the technique of selling stocks one doesn't own with the intention of borrowing the shares at the time of the transaction and repaying the obligation later when they can be repurchased at a lower price.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.